TEXAS FINED FOR NO CHILD DEFIANCE

TOE THE LINE, EDUCATION CHIEF WARNS THE AGENCY SHE ONCE HEADED
   Houston Chronicle -- April 23, 2005
                by Justin Gest

Washington - Education Secretary Margaret Spellings fined Texas $444,282
Friday for the state's continued defiance of the No Child Left Behind Act.

For the last two years, the Texas Education Agency has exceeded the
federal cap on how many students with learning disabilities can be
exempted from regular state testing, mandated by the act, in favor of an
easier exam.

In a stern letter addressed to Texas Education Commissioner Shirley
Neeley, Spellings said "the TEA has not shown cause why" she should not
withhold the money from the agency's 2004 federal grant.

"The TEA's proposed amendment was not consistent with the law and the
regulations, and something the Education Department could not approve,"
Spellings wrote.

It is only the second fine ever levied against a state under the 2001
landmark education law. It is also the steepest.

Minnesota was fined $113,000 by Spelling's predecessor, Rod Paige, for
not testing an adequate number of students in 2003.

In January, Paige threatened to fine Texas for noncompliance, but he
gave the state time to submit a defense.

Spellings, formerly of Houston, who took over later that month, was not
convinced by the state's justification of its actions.

Texas' fine comes a little more than two weeks after Spellings announced
that she would offer more flexibility in meeting No Child Left Behind
requirements to states that otherwise adhere to federal rules.

But Texas had flouted the federal guidelines.

Neeley's defiance touched off a public dispute between her and
Spellings, who helped design the original No Child Left Behind Act in
Texas when she advised then-Gov. George W. Bush from 1994 to 2000.

Neeley was accused of exempting the extra students to falsely inflate
state scores. In response, she said the Education Department was out of
touch with needs of students in Texas.

Texas may be subject to further sanctions.

The federal limit on the number of students who can take the special
exam remains capped at 1 percent, and Texas again exempted nearly 9
percent of its students during the current school year.

"We're going down another path where there's going to be another
standoff," said Patty Sullivan, director of the Center on Education
Policy in Washington. "They're probably going to fine the state again
this year."

But education experts said the penalties were not severe enough to force
Texas to change its guidelines.

The $444,282 fine represents a fraction of Texas' $1.1 billion federal
allocation, and a sliver of the state's $33 billion annual public
education budget.

"Texas got a slap on the hand for breaking a fundamental principle of No
Child Left Behind. Now any other state that doesn't comply is going to
expect a similar financial penalty," said Scott Young, a policy adviser
for the National Conference of State Legislatures.

"Texas called their bluff. Apparently, the department's not going to
jeopardize public education in Texas and the individual students there.
I can only imagine what Utah and Connecticut are thinking right now."

On Tuesday, Utah's Legislature passed a resolution that declares federal
education laws subordinate to state policy.

Last week, Connecticut officials announced plans to sue the Education
Department for the right to disregard federal rules, saying the federal
government fails to provide enough money.

It is unclear how Texas will return the money from its 2004 federal
allocation, all of which has been spent. Officials at both TEA and the
Education Department were unavailable for comment when the letter was
released Friday at 7:20 p.m. EDT.

To Rich Gibson's Home Page