Port Workers Protest Possible U.S. Intervention
Labor: The ILWU and Pacific Maritime Assn. have not been able
to agree on a contract, which expired July 1.
By LOUIS SAHAGUN and NANCY CLEELAND, Times Staff Writers
With the federal government threatening to get
involved in contract talks between port workers
and shipping firms, the International Longshore and
Warehouse Union on Monday decided it was time
to march.
Carrying signs that said "Fight Terrorism, Not
American Workers," about 2,000 union members
strode through downtown Long Beach to protest
federal plans for bringing in federal troops to run the
nation's busiest harbor complex should the two
sides fail to reach an agreement.
The contract, which covers more than 10,500 union
members at 29 West Coast ports handling 7% of
the U.S. gross domestic product, expired July 1.
Since then, the union and the Pacific Maritime
Assn., which represents shipping lines and
stevedoring companies, have been unable to reach
a settlement.
Negotiations resume today in San Francisco, after a three-week break called
by the union after its members rejected an offer from the shipping lines.
The Bush administration's threat to intervene has become a major point
of
contention. The White House convened a working group to monitor port talks
in June, with representatives from the departments of Labor, Commerce,
Transportation and Homeland Security.
A Labor Department official who has been in touch with the union and shipping
lines confirmed last week that he had discussed four options that might
come
into play if the union called a strike, including forcing union members
to work
through an 80-day cooling-off period or using Navy personnel to operate
port
equipment.
Speaking on condition that he not be identified, the official insisted
the
administration has been neutral but is worried that a port strike could
cripple
the economy.
The union responded Monday by sponsoring rallies in five port communities
from Portland, Ore., to San Diego, which drew half a dozen mayors, including
Willie Brown of San Francisco and Jerry Brown of Oakland, as well as Senate
Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), who spoke in Portland.
The march in Long Beach culminated in a demonstration at Lincoln Park
attended by supporters, who included Los Angeles City Councilwoman Janice
Hahn.
"We cannot allow the heavy hand of the Bush administration to come in here
and in any way change the outcome of the negotiations," Hahn told the
appreciative crowd.
"There's only one reason they would want to get involved at all," Hahn
said,
"and that's to break the union. We will not let that happen."
Union officials and rank-and-file members agreed, saying that U.S. intervention
would give shippers an unfair advantage.
"Why should the PMA even want to settle with us if federal troops are standing
behind them?" said Roxanne Lawrence, an ILWU marine clerk for 15 years.
"It's not fair and it's not right."
Added Lawrence: "Dispatching the National Guard to the ports in the name
of
national security would be an absolute mess."
From a stage erected in the shadow of PMA's Long Beach headquarters,
Dominic Maretti, a Los Angeles Harbor Commission liaison for the union,
said
port workers would never endanger national security and reminded the crowd
that, even in times of labor strife, longshore workers have done their
part for
the nation.
"This union has a long-standing policy," he said. "During a strike, we
move all
military goods, troops and passengers."
Rhetoric has grown tense in the last week, with each side claiming the
other is
not bargaining seriously. Key differences are the introduction of labor-saving
technology and union concerns about outsourcing jobs.
The Pacific Maritime Assn. has called for professional mediation unless
it sees
"hard bargaining" at the table today.
"If the union comes in with a proposal and I see any room at all for us
to begin
to get into real serious negotiations, then we can move forward," said
PMA
President Joseph Miniace.
Union spokesman Steve Stallone said members of the union negotiating team
met Monday afternoon to discuss a new proposal. However, he said they were
unlikely to agree to mediation as long as Bush administration officials
hold out
the prospect of intervention in the event of a strike.
The AFL-CIO executive council last week pledged its support to the longshore
union and called for no intervention. The Los Angeles City Council also
voted
to ask the Bush administration to remain outside the negotiations.
"Our contention is that we've never yet had an opportunity to sit down
with just
the two parties. We've always had a third party lurking in the background,"
said Stallone, referring to administration officials. "I think it's possible
to come
to an agreement if there's no intervention."
|