NY Times, Oct. 2, 2002
In South Africa, Leaders Face Blacks' Ire By RACHEL L. SWARNS
JOHANNESBURG, Oct. 1 — The black protesters marched by the thousands today through the gritty heart of this mining city. They shouted angry slogans, waved fiery banners and, for a moment, it felt like the old days when blacks took to the streets to oppose the white apartheid government.
But this time, black members of the trade unions and the Communist Party who fought to end white rule in South Africa were turning their ire against the black government they elected in 1994.
The demonstrators accused the government of losing touch with the poor, who are struggling to cope with deep unemployment and surging food prices. They demanded an end to the nation's privatization of state assets, which they say has resulted in job losses. "Create decent jobs!" the marchers cried. "Privatization is born-again apartheid!"
South Africa is often hailed for its efforts to undo the legacy of apartheid. The government has provided housing, electricity and water to poor blacks, and an educated and wealthy black elite has emerged.
But the bitterness of a black majority that still struggles to survive is increasingly bursting into the open. Nine years after Nelson Mandela was elected president amid national celebrations, disillusionment with the anti-apartheid government is bubbling up, particularly in poor and working-class communities.
"What is happening in the land?" the black protesters sang. "The government is our government, but they are privatizing everything."
The discontent is shaking the formidable political alliance between the governing African National Congress and its anti-apartheid allies, the Congress of South African Trade Unions and the South African Communist Party.
Both groups have attacked the government's conservative fiscal policies. The government has won praise from the International Monetary Fund, but the nation has lost thousands of jobs as the previously sheltered economy has been liberalized. Officials refuse to reverse privatization plans, saying such a move might threaten foreign investment.
Last month, the Communist Party warned in its newsletter that there was "a very real danger" that the A.N.C. would lose touch with its support base. On Friday, President Thabo Mbeki struck back, accusing his allies of spreading "falsifications" and "blatant untruths" and misleading people about continuing efforts to uplift the poor.
The union leaders and Communists ignored Mr. Mbeki's criticism and urged supporters to participate in a two-day general strike, which began today.
"The struggle now is about economic relations in the country," said Anthony Selepe, a regional secretary fpr the Congress of South African Trade Unions.
"We don't want a few to benefit; we want the society to benefit," he said. "We are not against the A.N.C., but people are losing jobs. People cannot afford their basic services."
No one is suggesting that this dissatisfaction will mean the early demise of the popular party that produced national heroes like Mr. Mandela, Joe Slovo and Oliver Tambo. The A.N.C. won 63 percent of the vote in the presidential election of 1994, and about 65 percent in the presidential poll of 1999. None of the other political parties comes close to matching that support.
The A.N.C. has worked to help the poor. A recent study by the South African Advertising Research Foundation found that about 50 percent of rural households had electricity now, compared to 17 percent in 1994. Water is piped into 76 percent of households today compared to 68 percent in 1994, the study said. The government has built more than one million houses for poor families.
But unemployment stands at nearly 30 percent, up from 17 percent in 1995. These days, some poor people speak wistfully about the apartheid days when jobs were more plentiful.
In a recent survey, nearly 40 percent of South Africans rated the government's performance as "poor" to "very poor," while just under 30 percent considered the government "good" to "very good."
In low-income households, the government's approval rating has declined sharply. The survey, conducted by the newspaper Business Day, found that 22 percent of the poor people polled said the government was doing a "very poor" job this year, up from 13 percent in 2000.
"It is true that we're soon going to enter the phase where the A.N.C. is going to have to work if it really wants to keep that 65 percent," Tom Lodge, a political scientist, said of the party's electoral support.
"It can no longer depend on blind faith the way it used to," he said. "More and more people are beginning to judge them on performance."
Mr. Lodge said that many South Africans fail to recognize the A.N.C.'s achievements. The government, which acknowledges this problem, announced this weekend that it would hold community meetings around the country to remind people of what has been accomplished.
Officials have also promised to increase benefits to poor families with children, and to increase black control of the economy, which is still dominated by whites.
In the meantime, Mr. Mbeki is telling citizens not to be fooled by his critics. "There are some among us who are easily seduced by revolutionary sounding phrases that are both dangerous and have no meaning," he said. "South Africa 2002 is a much better place than South Africa 1994."
Boikie Mohlamme, 71, an actor who joined the march today, said he still supported the A.N.C. But he said government officials had to work harder if they want to stay in power.
"The A.N.C. is still the party to belong to," he said, "but they must remember, it was the masses that put them there. To stay in power, they will also need the masses."
|