ovember 4, 2003
Extensive Flaws at Mutual Funds Cited at Hearing
By
STEPHEN LABATON
WASHINGTON, Nov. 3 — The mutual fund industry, plagued by a
series of recent scandals, was battered on Monday by new details of
widespread trading abuses, the removal of the top executive at a big
fund company and the disclosure by federal regulators that the industry
faced an imminent wave of government lawsuits.
The scandals also produced their first senior government
casualty when
Juan M. Marcelino, the head of the New England regional office of the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the last 10 years, said he would
step down amid criticism that his office failed to investigate promptly
a whistle-blower's accusations in March about problems at Putnam
Investments.
Putnam, the nation's fifth-largest fund company, said on
Monday that
its chief executive, Lawrence J. Lasser, would be leaving in the wake
of recent accusations by federal and state prosecutors of civil fraud
by the company.
As a result of those accusations, six states and New York City
have
told their public pension funds to stop using Putnam as a fund manager,
and others are considering similar moves.
On Capitol Hill, where federal and state officials testified
on Monday
at a Senate hearing on the mutual fund industry, lawmakers have begun
to call for significant changes in regulating the industry — which is
in its greatest turmoil since it came under federal oversight more than
60 years ago.
Mutual funds, which manage money on behalf of their
shareholders by
buying and selling stocks and bonds, control some $7 trillion in
investments for 95 million investors, and the industry's reputation as
a haven for unsophisticated and small investors has taken a beating.
Several lawmakers have introduced legislation that would
require
directors of mutual funds, including board chairmen, to be more
independent from the management of the funds. But federal and state
officials and other experts said on Monday that the problems were not
with the regulations but with lax enforcement of existing rules.
Eliot Spitzer, the New York State attorney general, who has
moved more
aggressively and quickly against the funds than his federal
counterparts, attributed the problems to complacent directors — a
shortcoming that has also troubled some of the nation's largest
corporations and the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Spitzer said that in
future settlements with funds, he would demand that the penalties for
serious infractions include returning fees to investors.
"We have opened up a window into a morass of problems," Mr.
Spitzer
said at the Senate hearing. "This is a window into what has been foggy,
murky and impossible to understand."
Stephen M. Cutler, the head of the S.E.C.'s enforcement
division, said
at the same hearing, by a Senate Governmental Affairs subcommittee that
investigations and a recent survey had found widespread suspicious
trading practices. They ranged from overcharging many customers to
giving preferential treatment to the largest ones, including
confidential market information.
"The `unholy trinity' of illegal late trading, abusive market
timing
and related self-dealing practices that have recently come to light are
matters that affect us all," Mr. Cutler asserted. "And they go right to
the heart of the trust — the covenant, if you will — between mutual
fund and other securities professionals and the individual investor. As
my colleagues and I have gathered evidence of one betrayal after
another, the feeling I'm left with is one of outrage."
Mr. Cutler also said more than 25 percent of brokerage firms
that sell
mutual funds and 10 percent of the funds surveyed had permitted
customers to engage in late trading that may have been improper. Such
trading involves buying or selling shares of a fund at the 4 p.m.
closing price at some point later in the day.
Documents from nearly one-third of the brokerage firms, he
said,
indicated that they might have helped customers engage in possibly
improper trades by such methods as concealing their clients' identities
through special accounts.
He said that more than 30 percent of the fund companies had
disclosed
information about their portfolios selectively, to certain
shareholders, giving them the ability to place advantageous trades.
Mr. Cutler and Mary L. Schapiro, the top regulator at NASD,
said a
joint inquiry had uncovered that at least one in five investors in
Class A shares of mutual funds — those that impose a sales charge
upfront — were not given discounts on large trades and, as a result,
were overcharged an average of $243 each in the last two years — a
total of at least $86 million.
Mr. Cutler said that "a significant number of brokerage firms"
would
receive notification this week that they were likely to face agency
charges of securities law violations for overcharging customers. The
firms were obliged to provide the customers with discounts for buying
shares above certain limits, but failed to, Mr. Cutler and Ms. Schapiro
said.
Ms. Schapiro said that about two dozen brokerage firms would
be accused
of failing to provide discounts to mutual fund investors. "There was
pretty systemic failure," she said.
While only three senators appeared at today's subcommittee
hearing,
there is deep interest in the issue in Congress. Both the Republican
chairman and the ranking Democrat on the full Senate Governmental
Affairs Committee criticized the S.E.C. for not moving sooner or acting
before problems were brought to its attention by Mr. Spitzer.
Senator Susan M. Collins, the Maine Republican who heads the
committee,
said, "I question why the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has
regulatory responsibility for the mutual funds and their
broker-dealers, has failed to detect these practices, to impose
appropriate restrictions on them, or to penalize those who appear to be
misusing investors money."
The senior Democrat on the committee, Senator Joseph I.
Lieberman of
Connecticut, issued a similar statement.
"The S.E.C. was far too late to the table in addressing these
problems," Mr. Lieberman said in a letter to William H. Donaldson, the
S.E.C. chairman. "Now that the problems have come to light," Mr.
Lieberman wrote, "I am once again left to wonder: why did the watchdogs
fail to bark?
Mr. Cutler acknowledged that the commission should have acted
more
promptly against Putnam. In March, a Putnam employee reported that some
union members were day-trading Putnam funds in their 401(k) plans —
moving money in or out within a single day — in ways that other
investors could not.
Mr. Cutler said the agency could not always handle such
complaints when
it receives an average of 1,000 tips a day.
"Do I wish that we'd have brought the Putnam case two months
ago
instead of two weeks ago?" he asked. "You bet I do."
The Boston office of the S.E.C. had neglected a tip from a
whistle-blower in March about problems at Putnam Investments — which
prompted the informant, an employee at a Putnam telephone call center —
to take his information to Massachusetts securities regulators. They
have since made a major case against the company based on the tip;
other accusations of improper trading practices by Putnam have also
been made recently by the commission.
The S.E.C. said Mr. Marcelino, the head of its New England
office, had
decided to step aside, "given the recent press coverage of certain
matters involving the Boston office, to minimize any further
distractions for his staff as they continue the critical work of the
office."
Three officials said Mr. Marcelino had been forced to resign
by Mr.
Cutler after Mr. Cutler became dissatisfied with his account of the
incident.
Mr. Marcelino, who in nearly 20 years of service at the
commission has
received several agency awards for distinguished service, did not
respond to calls left at his home and office for comment. Mr. Cutler,
in an interview this afternoon, said Mr. Marcelino had made a "personal
decision after a distinguished career to step down and I have to
respect that."
|