| Mixed Results for L.A.'s Magnet Schools
The programs have been academically successful but often come up short as a tool for integration.By Sandy BanksTimes Staff Writer January 20, 2006 By day's end, the parents of more than 60,000 children will have made their pitch to get into a magnet school, and Los Angeles Unified School District officials will begin sorting the requests by interest, by grade and, most important, by race. Only one in four students will be accepted. Others will be left wondering if they have been unfairly left on the sidelines by a 30-year-old process created for a district that no longer exists. The schools were supposed to be magnets for educational excellence, attracting motivated students to integrated campuses outside of their neighborhoods. When magnets were launched in 1976, almost 40% of the district's students were white, about one-third Latino and one-quarter black. Magnet schools were required to reflect that balance in a district facing a court order to desegregate. Today, magnets, as a group, are considered the best schools in a district mostly known for its problems. What many are not, however, is well-integrated. In today's district, fewer than one in 10 students is white. And magnets have emerged as a way of keeping the middle class in public schools. The best magnets have demonstrated that high-quality, specialized schools can attract families of all ethnicities from throughout the sprawling district. They offer a variety of disciplines tailored to student interests, and attract more than 60,000 applications every year for 15,000 or so open slots. The deadline for parents to apply for fall entry into a magnet is 5 p.m. today. Parents will learn in May whether their children were accepted. Some magnets encompass entire schools; others are small centers on large campuses. Busing is provided by the district. Their test scores typically surpass those of neighborhood schools, though they vary as much in quality as they do in philosophy. But as a tool for integration today, most magnets fail. Eighty-seven of the district's 162 magnets are virtually all black or Latino, and almost all of those considered integrated — those with 30% white students — are in or near the San Fernando Valley or the Westside. As the new head of the district's magnet program, Sharon Curry knows that magnets were intended to integrate schools. But as the former principal of a Mid-City magnet that she says tried and failed to attract middle-class whites, she also knows how difficult it can be to integrate a campus. Five years ago, Curry helped remake Crescent Heights Elementary into a language arts magnet with a social justice bent. With a new curriculum and a hand-picked staff, Crescent Heights improved its test scores, became a California Distinguished School and last year generated six applications for every open slot. Yet the school's demographics haven't budged. Despite the fact that it draws from a neighborhood where most of the residents are white, Crescent Heights has only three white children among its 350 students. Almost all the rest are black or Latino. "We had a big campaign to get excellent teachers, our scores went up, people began taking a look at the school," Curry recalled. "But white parents would come and see all these African American children and say, 'I don't want my child to be the only white child in the school.' " Her struggle illustrates both the promise and the problems of the magnet school system. Once a nationwide example of successful integration, the quota-driven magnet program may be on its way to becoming an anachronism. Begun with four schools in 1976, the magnet network was part of a court-ordered desegregation plan that relied heavily on mandatory busing, which was bitterly opposed by many parents. When the busing program ended three years later, the magnet network rapidly expanded — fed by a stream of state and federal desegregation funds. Some parents and educators have begun to question whether racial balance on a small group of high-achieving campuses is a reasonable priority in a district where more than three-quarters of the campuses remain segregated, 76% of students are too poor to pay for school lunches and half of students at some schools drop out before graduation. "We have a good program here with the magnets," says Supt. Roy Romer. "But I don't want them to become an elite school system that's only available to a few." Romer has opposed expanding the magnet system, contending that its academic success can be replicated by dividing neighborhood schools into small, theme-based programs. "We can build programs that have the same characteristics: choice by parents, high-quality instructional expectations and tools. Over time, if we have really good choices, parents will say, 'I'd rather have my youngster in this small learning community that's close to home' rather than busing kids all over town. "I still feel the need for integration, but the whole district has changed its composition of students. We have to address that reality." When the district was ordered to desegregate three decades ago, magnets aimed to preserve Los Angeles Unified's racial balance by setting aside 30% of the spots at each center for whites. But immigration, white flight, falling test scores, school budget woes and perceptions of mismanagement combined to change the face of the district. That demographic shift means the magnet system now bears little resemblance to the district it serves. Magnet students are 46% Latino, 20% white, 19% black and 14% Asian American, and are less likely to come from poor families than their counterparts at other district schools. Their academic success has made magnets a refuge for disaffected middle-class parents, who look at their neighborhood schools and see overcrowded classes, undisciplined students, unmotivated teachers and uneven achievement. But the magnets' rigid racial goals have drawn criticism from both opponents and supporters of the program. An anti-affirmative action group sued the district last October, arguing that magnets violate the state's Proposition 209, which bans preferential treatment based on race. And advocates for poor and minority children suggest that the magnet admission process and its outdated ethnic quotas favor whites at certain schools. "I've always held the belief that the way we distribute seats in the magnets no longer makes sense with today's demographics," said former school board President Jose Huizar, now a Los Angeles city councilman representing the Eastside. Huizar believes Latinos are discouraged from applying for magnets because "the process is not user-friendly." Every December, a "Choices" brochure — 12 pages this year — is sent to students' homes, detailing magnet options. Qualifying students are selected by lottery, but savvy parents study bus routes and schedules, acceptance rates, ethnic composition and the complicated system of "priority points" to maximize their children's chances. "A lot of our parents are immigrants, with little schooling," Huizar said. "We have these complicated booklets and this formula…. It's hard for me to understand, and I have three collegiate degrees." Magnet officials defend the racial quotas. "First and foremost, it's an integration program," said Joan Graham, the district specialist who coordinates the opening of the programs. "We want to be able to have integration. And white children bring that integration." Magnets, she said, help keep white and middle-class parents in public school. "A lot of these parents are in a position financially to send their kids to a private or parochial school, but want them to be in an environment where the other kids are not all like them, because that's what the real world is like," Graham said. "And yet they want high academic achievement. If they can get it without having to pay tuition, they'll come and they'll support your program." But she acknowledges that in the inner city, magnet schools are rarely well-integrated. Much has to do with geography. Few parents want the hours-long bus rides that cross-town magnets would require. Familiarity plays a part. Parents tend to rely on friends and neighbors to steer them to successful schools. And some white parents say they feel unwelcome or worry that their children will feel isolated in minority neighborhoods and schools. After 30 years, Graham said, it's clear "we are not ever going to be able to get the white population to come into certain areas." Some inner-city programs have difficulty even filling the seats they have. Washington Preparatory in South Los Angeles has three magnet programs, in science/technology, music and communication arts. Its music academy had only 46 applicants for 90 spots. The other two magnets had only a few more applicants than openings. Romer suspects that as new schools open and choice expands in the district — with charter schools, specialized academies, open enrollment — interest in the magnet program will wane. "We don't intend to dismantle it. We have a good program and we want to continue its quality," he said. "But as we grow small learning communities, we'll have multiple options for parents to choose from, and the difference between them and magnets may blend out over time." But the district's building boom may have the opposite effect. Campuses that are currently overcrowded help integrate suburban schools by sending them black, Latino and Asian students. "As we build new schools and every kid goes back to their neighborhood, a consequence will be less integration," said school board President Marlene Canter. "We're entering a whole new era. And that's going to give magnets a stronger role. Finally, we'll use them for what they were intended — a tool to focus on integration." * (BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX) L.A.'s magnet programs Some Los Angeles Unified School District magnet programs get far more applicants than they can accept, while others have relatively few applicants. Here's a look at those programs and the racial and ethnic breakdown of students in the district and its magnets. The system began in 1976. Race/ethnicity of students LAUSD, 1976 White: 38% Latino: 32% Black: 24% Asian: 6% -- LAUSD, 2004-2005* White: 9% Latino: 73% Black: 12% Asian: 6% Other: 1% *Does not total 100% because of rounding -- Magnet students, 2004-2005 White: 20% Latino: 46% Black: 19% Asian: 4% Other: 1% --
|